Russian Federation
Russian Federation
from 01.01.1988 until now
UDC 004.896
Objective: to develop a hybrid multi-criteria simulation model for a green supply chain aimed at identifying an optimal combination of green logistics tools. Methods: an analysis of current approaches that integrate multi-criteria decision-making methods with simulation modelling and linear programming was performed. The research explored the application of multi-criteria simulation models to represent the dynamic interactions among green supply chain indicators, material flow parameters, and green logistics tools. Amajor drawback of current integrated models lies in the selection of green logistics instruments: they often omit comprehensive assessments of sustainability indicators specific to each supply chain component and inadequately incorporate constraints arising from logistics resources. Consequently, creating a unified framework that combines multi-criteria analysis, optimization techniques, and simulation modelling is essential to advance the sustainability of green supply chains. Results: a method for integrating multi- criteria analysis, linear programming, and simulation modelling techniques has been proposed. Practical significance: the model developed in this research facilitates multi-criteria decision-making regarding the selection and application of effective green logistics tools within the supply chain.
ustainable development, green logistics, supply chain, hybrid model, multi-criteria model, simulation model, optimization
1. Osincev N. A., Rahmangulov A. N. Ocenka ustoychivosti cepey postavok na osnove serogo relyacionnogo analiza // Vestnik Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta im. G. I. Nosova. 2023. № 3 (21). S. 180–196.
2. Ahi P., Searcy C. An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 86. Pp. 360–377.
3. Osincev N. A., Rahmangulov A. N. Ustoychivoe razvitie logisticheskih cepey gruzopotokov: mono- grafiya. M.: Infra-M, 2025. 303 c.
4. A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: Research implications and future perspectives / U. R. de Oliveira [et al.] // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 187. Pp. 537–561.
5. Lu K., Liao H., Zavadskas E. K. An overview of fuzzy techniques in supply chain management: bibliometrics, methodologies, applications and future directions // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2021. Vol. 27 (2). Pp. 402–458.
6. Koncepciya gibridnoy mnogokriterial'noy modeli ustoychivoy cepi postavok / N. A. Osin- cev [i dr.] // Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvenno- go universiteta putey soobscheniya. 2024. № 1 (93). S. 90–104.
7. Hoffa-Dabrowska P., Grzybowska K. Simula- tion modeling of the sustainable supply chain // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 15 (12). P. 6007.
8. External integration mechanisms effect on the logistics performance of fruit supply chains. A dynamic s
9. Sustainability dimensions and PM 2.5 in supply chain logistics / J. Hong [et al.] // Annals of Operations Research. 2019. Vol. 275. Pp. 339–366.
10. Van Der Vorst J. G. A. J., Tromp S. O., Zee D. J. Simulation modelling for food supply chain redesign; integrated decision making on product quality, sustainability and logistics // International Journal of Production Research. 2009. Vol. 23 (47). Pp. 6611–6631.
11. Eising J. W., Van Onna T., Alkemade F. Towards smart grids: Identifying the risks that arise from the integration of energy and transport supply chains // Applied Energy. 2014. Vol. 123. Pp. 448–455.
12. Moradi S., Sierpiński G., Masoumi H. System dynamics modeling and fuzzy MCDM approach as support for assessment of sustainability management on the example of transport sector company // Energies. 2022. Vol. 13 (15). P. 4917.
13. Sahay N., Ierapetritou M. Supply chain management using an optimization driven simulation approach // AIChE Journal. 2013. No. 2 (59). Pp. 4612– 4626.
14. Bi-objective decision support tool based on system dynamics and discrete event modelling for sustainable supply chain / J. Yu [et al.] // Journal of circular economy. 2023. Pp. 1–20.
15. Vieira A. A. C., Figueira J. R., Fragoso R. A multi-objective simulation-based decision support tool for wine supply chain design and risk management under sustainability goals // Expert Systems with Applications. 2023. P. 120757.
16. Tao Z., Li M. What is the limit of Shinese coal supplies – A STELLA model of Hubbert Reak // Energy Policy. 2007. Vol. 6 (35). Pp. 3145–3154.
17. Orji I. J., Wei S. An innovative integration of fuzzy-logic and systems dynamics in sustainable supplier selection: A case on manufacturing industry // Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2015. Vol. 88. Pp. 1–12.
18. Guo W., Chen S., Lei M. Evolutionary game and strategy analysis of carbon emission reduction in supply chain based on system dynamic model // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15 (11). P. 8933.
19. Kumar A., Rahman S. RFID-enabled process reengineering of closed-loop supply chains in the healthcare industry of Singapore // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014. Vol. 85. Pp. 382–394.
20. Jing L., Felix T. S. Chan. An agent-based model of supply chains with dynamic structures // Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2013. Vol. 7 (37). Pp. 5403– 5413.
21. Manufacturers’ green decision evolution based on multi-agent modeling / Z. Li [et al.] // Complexity. 2019. Vol. 14. P. 3512142.
22. Osincev N. A. Koncepciya sistemy upravle- niya logisticheskimi potokami v «zelenyh» cepyah postavok // Vestnik Ural'skogo gosudarstvenno- go universiteta putey soobscheniya. 2020. № 2 (46). S. 81–92.
23. Kornilov S. N., Rahmangulov A. N., Shaul'- skiy B. F. Osnovy logistiki. M.: Uchebno-metodi- cheskiy centr po obrazovaniyu na zheleznodorozhnom transporte, 2016. 302 s.
24. Imitacionnye modeli v cifrovyh dvoy- nikah zheleznodorozhnyh uzlov / A. N. Rahmangu- lov [i dr.] // Vestnik Ural'skogo gosudarstvenno- go universiteta putey soobscheniya. 2022. № 3 (55). S. 43–59.
